data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fab98/fab983e03cd527d69c956524528fa0933cbe1d8c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e35b0/e35b05bd6433948c729d673bece2680d5c9518fd" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a479/6a479fa32540bdd964c1d667333b61e5162b8b26" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2199e/2199ebfe0a3222afa0cc4b091270941cd3934c1d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e687/7e687b93ac98262b388a32bc7183473f1d487db9" alt=""
.
Survey today at Colemere, near Ellesemere. Our group didn't find any water vole evidence, but we did see a toad, a field vole and a lot of dragonflies, butterflies and damselflies. Not sure yet how the other groups got on.
.
On the way home I checked White Lion Meadow car park and found feeding and droppings, despite the downpours and fluctuating water levels of late. A stroll up Edward German Drive revealed several burrows (for scale, think of a Pringles tube) and some feeding.
.
Update regarding the other survey groups' results, from Malcolm Monie's report: Some signs were found in and near the Roden itself in the Wolverley area, but at a low density. Upstream, the brook flowing out of Colemere was examined and despite good habitat, no water vole signs were to be found. A survey 3km farther downstream revealed just one site where a couple of burrows and possible water vole feeding signs were found, as distinct from field voles which were present on the same stretch.
.
We think mink presence plus only intermittently suitable habitat are the key issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment