Wednesday, 5 February 2014

Water Voles and Flooding



The Environment Agency removing unlawful timber revetments along the bank at Edward German Drive. This will help protect properties with better flood management, and also benefit water voles.

 Further up the brook at Edward German Drive: water vole paw prints.

 The brook by the railway bridge burst its banks last week. I hope some of the voles have escaped up the higher bank.

 Water vole footprints at White Lion Meadow (near Tesco).

 The flooded field off Edgeley Road. There are are no high banks into which the voles can climb out of the way of the water, so I'm hoping they've been able to take refuge in the sedge.

At the moment there are no signs at all in the field off Edgeley Road, unless this photo above is a burrow. Water voles don't usually leave spoil heaps outside, though, so it could be mole or rat.


I was dismayed and cross to hear on the radio a few days ago Michael Eavis name-check water voles as one of the causes of flooding. I know: how bizarre can you get? His argument was that 'rivers aren't being dredged properly because of environmentalists wanting to protect riparian habitat', and that 'dredging alone is the solution to managing extreme rainfall'.

He's wrong about dredging, as this article explains:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/30/dredging-rivers-floods-somerset-levels-david-cameron-farmers but he's also wrong to reference water voles as they don't even live along broad, fast-flowing rivers, so they're just not part of the equation here.

In fact the one place in Whitchurch that's flooded this winter happens to be immediately downstream from a channel that's been dredged by the landowner, although I think the immediate cause was a blockage under the bridge.

I can understand Eavis wanting to look for scapegoats, but that's not the way to solve the problem. Unusual dramatic flooding is bad for everyone, voles included, and needs a joined-up strategy from a forward-thinking, intelligent Minister for the Environment. One who understands that what's bad for wildlife is bad for humans too.

2 comments:

  1. I noted a few of the papers were having a crack at nature based reasons for flooding in Somerset - dredging halted for wildlife concerns, and in Dawlish where delays to sea defences were blamed on a wildlife impact assessment by the Telegraph. Pisses me off.

    ReplyDelete